Legal Opinion

State v. Buie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1975No. 7520SC179PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The defendant was convicted as a principal of the crimes of breaking or entering, felonious larceny, and attempted safe-cracking, though he was not actually present at the scene of the crimes. There are two exceptions to the rule that, an accused cannot be convicted as a principal when he is not actually present at the scene. First, if the defendant was constructively present when the crime was committed and aided or abetted the others in the commission of the crime, he would be a principal in the second degree and equally guilty with the others. State v. Mitchell, 24 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. People v. WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. RuffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API