Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 20, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant has raised a number of objections to the indictment. The indictment contains all necessary averments. The fact that it carries, in addition to the requirements of G.S. 14-5, the words “did incite, move, aid, counsel, hire” neither contradicts nor invalidates the charge which is otherwise in the wording of the statute. The crime charged is a common law offense. The essential elements necessary to be charged are described in State v. Bass, 255 N.C. 42, 120 S.E. 2d 580 and State v. Williams, 208 N.C. 707, 182 S.E. 131. The indictment is valid.

The defendant objected to the court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. State v. . MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. DoughtieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API