Legal Opinion
Keenan v. Artintype Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Baer, Jr., J.
This is an action between an employer and a former em*91ployee in which the latter claims damages based upon the farmer’s alleged breach of contract and fraud and interference with the contract of employment by a codefendant. Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7) or for summary judgment, as well as for leave to amend the answers. Plaintiff moves for an order striking the answers or, in the alternative, compelling the testimony at a deposition of defendant Seymour Gould and another.1
Preliminarily, on the amendment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Guard-Life Corp. v. S. Parker Hardware Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Channel Master Corp. v. Aluminium Limited Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- D & N Boening, Inc. v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minetos v. City University of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996