Legal Opinion
Burke v. Stevens
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 1968No. Civ. 903PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
—The plaintiff, Ralph Burke, filed a complaint to quiet title to lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 of Moxley and Potter’s Subdivision No. 1 in Tulare County. It alleges that B. L. Stevens and James F. Stevens, sons of his deceased wife by an earlier marriage, claim an interest in the land without right. One of the defendants, James F. Stevens, alleges in his answer that he has succeeded to the interest of his brother, B. L. Stevens, and that, although under the will of his deceased mother, the plaintiff is entitled to a life estate in an undivided one-half interest in the land, and also owns…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Wilk v. VencillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kimbro v. KimbroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Gordon v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Riddle v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Clark v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lonergan v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Seltzer v. SeltzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Crowther v. MowerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.