Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Robison v. Campbell

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1983No. 5464Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLopez, Judge

(concurring in part knd dissenting in part.).

I concur in part and dissent in part with the majority opinion.

1. I agree with the two issues summarily disposed of in the majority opinion and I agree with the decision on costs.

2. I disagree with the majority opinion on the issue between Katz and the Sutin firm on attorneys’ fees.

Under this point Katz challenges the court’s findings number 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17 and conclusions of law numbers 11 and 12. The challenged findings and conclusions provide as follows:

8. There were no offers of settlement. What could have been deemed a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robison v. KatzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. O'BRIEN v. Great Northern Railroad CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Prichard v. FulmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  4. In Re PolumboDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1967
  5. Swanson v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API