Oden v. SEPTA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KEARNEY, District Judge.
Discrimination law has long required disabled employees suing their former employer for discrimination and retaliation after requests for accommodations to timely bring administrative claims. Upon arriving in federal court, the employee must addtice specific facts after discovery sufficient to create genuine of issues of material fact regarding whether the employer’s termination is pretext for invidious discriminatory. intent. The employee meets this burden with evidence which could lead a fact-finder to disbelieve the employer’s business reason or believe an…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- ACEVEDO v. CITY OF READINGDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- CAGNETTI v. JUNIPER VILLAGE AT BENSALEM OPERATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- CAMPO v. MID-ATLANTIC PACKAGING SPECIALTIES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- DAVIS v. NATIONAL HMEDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Davis v. Elwyn, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.