Varner v. State

*7OPINION

Convicted of two counts of forgery and two counts of uttering a forged instrument, appellant contends several rulings of the district court were erroneous.

First, appellant contends his Fourth Amendment rights were violated by police who, with his parents’ consent, searched the room he occupied in his parents’ home, and there seized several items, one a check protector which was received in evidence at his trial. Although appellant claims to have been a tenant there, with sole right of control over the room he commonly occupied, cf. Stoner v. California, 376 U.S. 483 (1964), the record…