State v. Sorenson
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Eather, J.:
This is an appeal by the state from an order granting the respondents a new trial after they had been found guilty by a jury of grand larceny. Such new trial was granted on account of asserted misconduct in permitting to be exhibited to the jury a pair of chalk-stained shoes which had not been admitted in evidence. The appeal is based on the contention that the granting of a new trial was an abuse of the trial court’s discretion. We have concluded that there was no such clear abuse of discretion as to justify a reversal.
Defendants were charged with having stolen…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. GriffinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Varner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1974
- Warden, Nevada State Prison v. CravenNevada Supreme Court · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.