Sturm v. Seamonds
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Maxwell, Judge:
This case presents the question of the sufficiency of a petition for mandamus. The circuit court sustained a demurrer to the petition and certified the matter here for review.
The relator, Harley O. Sturm, is a policeman of the City of Huntington. The respondents, George- R. Seamonds, Mayor of the City, R. C. Adkins, A. J. Baker, F. M. Mullins and L. J. Swann, are trustees of the Policeman’s Pension or Relief Fund of that city. By bill in equity the respondents heretofore sought judicial determination of the legal question hereinafter considered. Their bill was dismissed because…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Furlong v. McCollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Seamonds v. SturmWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cawley v. Board of Trustees of Firemen's PensionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- Spencer v. YeraceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1971
- Dougherty v. City of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief Fund of the City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
- Craig v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.