Legal Opinion

Seamonds v. Sturm

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1939No. CC 616PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, Judge:

In 1926 the defendant Sturm applied for a position in the police department of the City of Huntington; was examined by its Civil Service Board, and the result certified to the City’s Board of Commissioners as provided by the city charter of 1921, then in force, and was appointed a policeman. He served continuously as such until just prior to the institution of this suit, when he became totally disabled physically. He then applied for a pension from the Policemen’s Pension Fund. The trustees of the fund brought this suit for judicial instruction on whether to grant the pension…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. GinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Clay v. GurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
  3. McDonald v. JarvisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Harrison v. OwsleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Stapylton v. NeeleySupreme Court of Florida · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sturm v. SeamondsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Register of WillsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API