Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 10, 2016No. 14CV1087; A159664PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDehoog, J.

This case arises from the same quiet title action underlying our opinion in Dayton v. Jordan, 279 Or App 737, 381 P3d 1031 (2016) (Dayton I), and involves the parties’ competing interests in a road that runs through Stephen Dayton and Carolyn Dayton’s (plaintiffs) property and provides access to the Oregon Dunes. In Randy Jordan and Sun Buggy Fun Rentals, Inc.’s (defendants) second counterclaim, the only claim at issue in this appeal, defendants sought a declaration that they have an easement “implied from prior use” over the disputed road and sought to enjoin plaintiffs from interfering with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whinston v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Cheney v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Venture Properties, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Eagles Five, LLC v. LawtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farnsworth v. Meadowland Ranches, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Dayton v. JordanCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Block v. DEA Properties-2 LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. Dayton v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Marshall v. CannadyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API