Taylor v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Thiele, J.:
This was a proceeding under the workmen’s compen*764sation act. The district court denied any award to the claimant and he appeals.
In a preliminary way it may be stated that G. V. Taylor operated a business of refining oil and making gasoline and other petroleum products at Chase, Kan., under the name H & T Refining Company, and that the St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company was his insurance carrier. Arthur Taylor, a son of G. V. Taylor, was an employee of his father. He was injured under circumstances later set forth, and filed a claim for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
- Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
3Cited by10 opinions
- Duncan v. Perry Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
- Place v. Falcon Seaboard Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Campos v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.