Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1943No. 35,841PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was a proceeding under the workmen’s compen*764sation act. The district court denied any award to the claimant and he appeals.

In a preliminary way it may be stated that G. V. Taylor operated a business of refining oil and making gasoline and other petroleum products at Chase, Kan., under the name H & T Refining Company, and that the St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company was his insurance carrier. Arthur Taylor, a son of G. V. Taylor, was an employee of his father. He was injured under circumstances later set forth, and filed a claim for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. MatlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Perry Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. Madison v. Key Work Clothes, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Gray v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. Place v. Falcon Seaboard Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Campos v. Garden City Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API