Legal Opinion
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 27, 1981No. 81 Civ. 458(RLC)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
Discovery disputes have slowed the orderly course of this action in which plaintiff, Carter-Wallace, Inc. (“C-W”), seeks treble damages and injunctive relief for alleged anticompetitive activities engaged in by defendants, Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc. and The Hartz Mountain Corporation (collectively “Hartz”). Plaintiff moves pursuant to Rule 37, F.R.Civ.P., for an order compelling defendants to produce transcripts of all depositions (with exhibits) taken by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (“Robins”) in a recently settled litigation against Hartz, A. H.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Hillside Amusement Co. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garcia v. PeeplesTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Deford v. Schmid Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1987
- Tucker v. Ohtsu Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Wauchop v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.