Weems v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtB-Ricken, P. J.
It is provided by statute (section 3258, Code 1923): “In cases taken to the supreme court or court of appeals under the provisions of this chapter [74 of the Code], ho assignment of errors or joinder in errors is necessary; but the court must consider all questions apparent on the record or reserved by bill of exceptions, and must render such judgment as the law demands,” etc.
In compliance with the foregoing statutory requirement, we have examined the record in this ease, and as a result of ■ the reversible errors apparent thereon we need not consider the points of decision presented by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Scott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Arthur v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Pate v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clements v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Aiola v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Hamilton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Mauldin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
- Dunn v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.