Hamilton v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
The judgment heretofore rendered in this cause is hereby withdrawn and nullified.
This appeal is on the record proper. The defendant below, appellant here, was charged by indictment with forgery in the second degree. The instrument alleged to have been forged was a note and securing personal property mortgage executed to t’he Star Finance Co., of Tuscaloosa. The instrument is set forth in the indictment.
The jury returned the following verdict: “We, the jury, find the defendant guilty of forgery in the third degree as charged in the indictment.”
Judgment of guilt was entered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
- Jarnigan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Weems v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Christison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1960
- Wilbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.