Arthur v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PÓSTER, J.
The indictment contained two counts, the first count charging the defendant with ■ distilling or making alcoholic liqu.or; the second count charging that the defendant had in Jhis possession, a still, etc.
The court gave the' general affirmative charge for the defendant as to the first count,'and the jury’s verdict was:
“We the jury find the defendant guilty of distilling as charged- in the second count of the indictment.”
The evidence for the state tended to show that defendant had a pasture on the plantation of one Kirkpatrick in Dallas county, that the defendant was in the pasture…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- Bollinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Borza v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Aiola v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
- Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.