Legal Opinion

Arthur v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1923No. 2 Div. 277PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PÓSTER, J.

The indictment contained two counts, the first count charging the defendant with ■ distilling or making alcoholic liqu.or; the second count charging that the defendant had in Jhis possession, a still, etc.

The court gave the' general affirmative charge for the defendant as to the first count,'and the jury’s verdict was:

“We the jury find the defendant guilty of distilling as charged- in the second count of the indictment.”

The evidence for the state tended to show that defendant had a pasture on the plantation of one Kirkpatrick in Dallas county, that the defendant was in the pasture…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ryan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Bollinger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Borza v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Aiola v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API