Legal Opinion

Hoffman Candy Co. v. Department of Liquor Control

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1949No. 4357PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By THE COURT.

Submitted on motion by the plaintiff-appellee seeking an order dismissing the appeal for the reason that the defendants-appellants have failed to file a bill of exceptions as required by §11564 GC. Counsel for the appellants admit that a bill of exceptions has not been filed in compliance with §11564 GC, but urges that the same has no application; that the Code has application only when the decision is not entered on the record, which is not the fact in the instant case; that on the contrary the decision of the trial court appears on the record, the same being the basis of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hulett v. HulettOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Hughes v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cleveland Building Laborers' Union v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. In re Estate of AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Billiard v. Board of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. State Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. Bretscher v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API