In re Estate of Anderson
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By THE COURT.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal for the alleged reason that *127the appellant has failed to comply with Rule VII of this Court in that no assignments of error or bill of exceptions have been filed within 50 days from the filing of the notice of appeal. The record discloses that appellant’s opening brief was filed within the required time and an examination of the same discloses that a bill of exceptions is not necessary to exemplify the errors complained of, but that they appear from the record. A bill of exceptions is therefore not necessary to perfect the appeal.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Binns v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1937
- Hoffman Candy Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1949
- Sokolowski v. LuceyOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re Estate of TurpenOhio Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of VerbeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
- In Re Will of YostOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cafe Tia Juana, Inc. v. State Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1956