Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 18, 1984No. 82-T-29; CA A26497PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This is an unemployment tax case in which petitioners challenge respondent’s assessment of taxes for amounts paid to various providers of services to petitioners’ logging partnership. We state our conclusions based upon a review of the record without extended written analysis. The Ponderosa Inn, Inc. v. Emp. Div., 63 Or App 183, 193 n 1, 663 P2d 1291 (1983). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Under ORS 657.040 all services performed for an employer by an individual for remuneration are deemed employment unless the employer can show that the individual is and will be free from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. PeetOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ponderosa Inn, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Carpet Mill & Lighthouse v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cejas Commercial Interiors, Inc. v. Torres-LizamaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Avanti Press, Inc. v. Employment Department Tax SectionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Chard v. Beauty-N-Beast SalonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Automotive Technology, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API