Legal Opinion

Pace v. Quintanilla

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 31, 2015No. Case No.: CV 14-2067 DOC(RNBx)Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION [76]

DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (“Mot.”) (Dkt. 76).

I. Background

This lawsuit is a putative securities fraud class action brought by Plaintiffs George Zuzulock, William Weakley, and Penny Pace against Defendants Timothy Quintanilla, Henry Mendoza, Bill Torres, James Francis Berger, and Cindy E. Gonzalez. Plaintiffs are purchasers of common stock of Electronic Game Card, Inc. (“EGC”) between March 26, 2008 and February 19, 2010. First Amended Compl. (“FAC”) (Dkt. 64) ¶3.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API