Legal Opinion

Halstead v. American Magnestone Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1925No. 12,188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Action by appellee on account, in which it seeks to recover for stucco sold appellant.

To the complaint, appellant filed answer in two paragraphs, the first being a general denial and a second alleging a breach of implied warranty, and asking recoupment. To this paragraph, appellee filed a general denial.

There was a trial by the court which resulted in a judgment for appellee in the sum of $992.90 and against appellant on his demand for recoupment.

The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.

We give no consideration to appellant’s contention…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merchants National Bank v. NeesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Brenton v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co. v. ComptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Burke v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Sheffield-King Milling Co. v. Spink Milling Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Wilson, Admx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Columbus v. Goodnow, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Middleby-Marshall Oven Co. v. WagonerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API