Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co. v. Compton
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Appellees sued appellants for fraud and deceit. Appellant company is a foreign corporation whose home is at Shenandoah, Iowa. Appellant Rodgers is the company’s district agent at Franklin, Indiana. In substance and effect the complaint alleges that appellants falsely* represented by printed advertisements and verbal statements that their “Economy Stock Powder” was beneficial for conditioning hogs, and particularly good for brood sows; that appellees relied on these representations, purchased the powder and fed it to their brood sows which were in health; that the powder made them sick and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Shea v. Glendale Elastic Fabrics Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- State v. Hudson County News Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Clark v. PiccilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- State v. HayesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.