Legal Opinion

Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co. v. Compton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1922No. 24,131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Appellees sued appellants for fraud and deceit. Appellant company is a foreign corporation whose home is at Shenandoah, Iowa. Appellant Rodgers is the company’s district agent at Franklin, Indiana. In substance and effect the complaint alleges that appellants falsely* represented by printed advertisements and verbal statements that their “Economy Stock Powder” was beneficial for conditioning hogs, and particularly good for brood sows; that appellees relied on these representations, purchased the powder and fed it to their brood sows which were in health; that the powder made them sick and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Epps v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Shea v. Glendale Elastic Fabrics Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  2. State v. Hudson County News Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Clark v. PiccilloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  5. State v. HayesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API