Legal Opinion

Burke v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1897No. 2,276PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

— Suit by appellee against appellants on a written order for the purchase of a corn husker by appellants from appellee. The defense made was based upon an alleged breach of warranty contained in the written order for the machine, as follows:

“The above machine is warranted to be well made and to do a reasonable amount of work (the amount and condition of the work varying with the condition of the corn fodder), leaving the fodder in a suitable condition to feed, and husking the corn as clean as is possible to do with a machine, shelling but little corn; the amount shelled varying with the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Russell & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lagler v. RochIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Sanderson v. Trump Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Linderman Machine Co. v. Hillenbrand Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Schaefer v. FiedlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API