Legal Opinion

Fishel v. Goddard

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1902No. 4200PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

*150This is an action in the nature of a creditors’ bill, commenced by appellees, judgment creditors of the Fishel-Schlichten Importing Company, a corporation, for an accounting and to recover from Gilbert B. Fishel and others named, who were directors of the corporation, the amount of their judgments, on •the ground that they had converted assets of the company to their own use in excess of such judgments. This, it was claimed, had been effected by the appellant, acting in concert with certain of his co-directors, in purchasing at a mortgage sale goods of the company, for a sum less than their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Morgan v. KingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  3. Jones v. Bank of LeadvilleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Four Mile Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  5. Tobin Canning Co. v. FraserTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,041 Delgado Oil Company, Inc. v. Michael R. Torres, James R. ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Rosebud Corp. v. BoggioColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Stuart v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  4. Crowley v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. New Crawford Valley, Ltd. v. BenedictColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API