Legal Opinion

Krull v. Jones

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided April 26, 1999No. Civ. 97-3007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

KORNMANN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

[¶ 1] This is the second time a disposi-tive motion in this case has come before the Court. The Court has set forth in its previous opinion the nature of plaintiffs claims, which will be repeated here for the sake of clarity.

[¶ 2] Title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 authorizes federal grants to state rehabilitation agencies to assist states in helping handicapped individuals prepare for and engage in gainful employment. 29 U.S.C. § 720, et seq. State rehabilitation plans must provide for individual written rehabilitation plans (“IWRP”)…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Jane Donaho v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as Plan Administrator of the Fmc Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Axness v. Aqreva LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. GerlachDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015