Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Zahn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 20, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-292PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Judge.

The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying appellants’ motion for new trial, which alleged that a juror concealed her bias and prejudice on voir dire and introduced extraneous prejudicial information into jury deliberations. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the judgment.

I

On December 9, 1986, John Huston, M.D., and Beverly Huston (Hustons) brought a medical malpractice claim against F. Darwin Zahn, M.D., Charles M. Rucker, M.D., and various medical associations (the doctors), alleging that the doctors negligently…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patton v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. John F. Hendrix, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Schade v. DiethrichArizona Supreme Court · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kendrick v. PippinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  3. Ledbetter v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  4. State v. MillsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Perez v. Community Hospital of Chandler, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API