Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Sauseda

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1982No. Docket 55444, 55445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. C. Penzien, J.

These cases consolidated on appeal are taken from rulings by the trial court refusing to set aside a default judgment entered against Leon Sauseda for injuries suffered by plaintiff Mildred Maynard, as a result of a collision between a motor vehicle driven by defendant Leon Sauseda and owned by his brother Andrew Sauseda, and from rulings by the trial court directing that the default judgment be paid by Leon’s insurer, United Fire Insurance Company (United), in garnishment proceedings filed by plaintiffs against United, after plaintiffs had taken an assignment of Leon’s contractual rights…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Moyses v. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Morrill v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
  2. Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Triple U Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation L.R. Houck and Jerry Houck v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. Maynard v. SausedaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API