Legal Opinion

Maynard v. Sauseda

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1983No. Docket Nos. 73952, 73953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We revisit this case by reason of an order of the Supreme Court dated September 21, 1983, vacating the judgment of this Court in Maynard v Sauseda, 121 Mich App 644; 329 NW2d 774 (1982), and remanding to this Court "for reconsideration in light of Stockdale v Jamison, 416 Mich 217; 330 NW2d 389 (1982)”. 417 Mich 1100.20; 338 NW2d 189 (1983).

The difference between our opinion in Maynard, supra, and the Supreme Court’s opinion in Stock-dale, supra, lies in the amount of damages held to be recoverable upon a default judgment obtained by an injured party when an insurance company breaches its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Maynard v. SausedaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API