Maynard v. Sauseda
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We revisit this case by reason of an order of the Supreme Court dated September 21, 1983, vacating the judgment of this Court in Maynard v Sauseda, 121 Mich App 644; 329 NW2d 774 (1982), and remanding to this Court "for reconsideration in light of Stockdale v Jamison, 416 Mich 217; 330 NW2d 389 (1982)”. 417 Mich 1100.20; 338 NW2d 189 (1983).
The difference between our opinion in Maynard, supra, and the Supreme Court’s opinion in Stock-dale, supra, lies in the amount of damages held to be recoverable upon a default judgment obtained by an injured party when an insurance company breaches its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Stockdale v. JamisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Maynard v. SausedaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Capitol Reproduction, Inc. v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. KeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1989