Vanscot Concrete Co. v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FARRIS, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether or not an appeal can be brought in the name of a nonexisting appellant. We hold that it cannot and order the appeal dismissed.
This is a ghost story with two ghosts. One is the specter of limitations; neither party’s brief mentions it, but it is a specter that is never out of mind. The named appellant, Vanscot Concrete Company, is the other ghost.
Vanscot Concrete Company was merged into Tarmac Texas, Inc., on June 30, 1986, and after that did not exist. Three months later, on October 4,1986, the appellee, Wallace Bailey, Jr., was injured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rooke v. JensonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Stinson v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Hunt v. BurrageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Onion v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bailey v. Vanscot Concrete Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Vanscot Concrete Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Vanscot Concrete Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Vanscot Concrete Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993