Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Burrage

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 25, 1935No. 11634PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Justice.

In a suit in a district court of Dallas county, styled C. R. Adkins et al. v. C. M. Joiner, a receiver was appointed. As a part of the property passing into the possession of the receiver, there were 500 acres of land known as the Daisy Bradford tract, and also 80 acres of land on which Joiner well No. 3 is located. A master in chancery was appointed to pass upon the claims of various parties in this receivership, and to report his conclusions to the court.

On April 7, 1931, appellee, Richard W. Burrage, filed a- plea in intervention in the original suit and claimed an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. StarkTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Royal Neighbors of America v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Moore v. StarkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burrage v. Hunt Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Hunt Production Co. v. BurrageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Gilson v. Universal Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Phelan v. PhelanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Kendrick v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API