Legal Opinion

Harold Brown v. Jorge L. Pastrana

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 15, 2011No. 11-11350UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Harold Brown, a federal prisoner, filed a pro se 1 civil rights complaint against Jorge Pastrana, Andre Warren, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), 2 under Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), arising out of an incident where Brown fell approximately eight feet from a bunk ladder in his prison cell. Brown appeals: (1) the district court’s sua sponte dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), of his claims concerning the conditions of his confinement; and (2) the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. COPELAND v. D. PERRYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. COPELAND v. D. PERRYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Childress v. CoreCivicDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022
  4. GLASSER v. SHIMONIS-KAMINSKIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
  5. Glass v. BriggsDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API