Salmon v. Exxon Corp.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
Exxon Corporation filed this motion for summary judgment contending that it is James L. Salmon’s statutory employer, and thus it is immune from plaintiffs claim for work-related injuries. For reasons which follow, the Court finds that Exxon is plaintiffs statutory employer. Therefore, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is hereby granted.
FACTS
Exxon Chemical Americas entered into a written contract with UMC of Louisiana, Inc., whereby UMC of Louisiana, Inc. would perform the mechanical portion of a turnaround 1 on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2000
- Hester v. Pioneer Chlor Alkali Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Clark v. Exxon Corp.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1994
- Albert Knight v. Turner Industries Group, LLC, et al.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Jared Breaux et al. v. Occidental Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.