Komala v. Soderholm
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti
The central issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly-entered a judgment by default against- the plaintiffs, John and Vera Komala, as a discovery sanction under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 219(c)(v) (87 Ill. 2d R. 219 (c)(v)). In 1981, the plaintiffs filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a judicial determination that Myrtle B. Soderholm, an incompetent, had the requisite mental capacity to create a number of Totten Trust accounts under which the plaintiffs were the beneficiaries. The defendant-appellee herein, La Salle National Bank (the conservator), was named as the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. ClarkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- Schwartz v. MoatsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Williams v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Estate of SoderholmAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- White v. Office of Public DefenderDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. Mulligan Masonry Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003