Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Moats

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1971No. 11442PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

Pursuant to Rule 219(c) of the Supreme Court, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 110A, par. 219), defendants’ answer was dismissed and judgment entered for plaintiff in the amount sought in his complaint. This sub-paragraph reads as follows:

“If a party * * * unreasonably refuses to comply with any provision of rules [relating to discovery] or fails to comply with any order entered under these rules, the court, on motion, may enter, * * * such orders as are just, including, among others, the following:

« # #(v) that, as to claims or defenses asserted in any pleading to which that issue is material, a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allegro v. Afton Village Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Danforth v. Checker Taxi Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  3. Gillespie v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  4. Smith v. PappasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  5. Booth v. SuttonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. People v. RayfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Cedric Spring & Associates, Inc. v. N.E.I. Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Servbest Foods, Inc. v. Emessee Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. Williams v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API