Cargill, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
The difficult question presented by this appeal is whether certain expenses incurred by claimant-appellants Cargill, Inc. (Cargill) and Cargo Carriers, Inc. (Cargo Carriers), as a result of an unusual concatenation of events on the Buffalo River during the night of January 21, 1959, are recoverable as a matter of law.
The misadventures leading to the catastrophe on the river that fateful evening were set forth when this litigation was previously before this court, 338 F.2d 708 (1964). For our purposes it is sufficient to state that as a result of the negligence…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Southern Railway Co. v. CliftSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- The AuroraDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1945
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kinsman Transit Company v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Peck v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970
- Complaint of the Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
- City of Joliet v. Southern Towing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005