Legal Opinion
Complaint of the Bethlehem Steel Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 20, 1977No. Civ. A. No. C75-104PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KRUPANSKY, District Judge.
This is a maritime action wherein plaintiff, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, has asserted its statutory right, pursuant to 46 U.S.C. §§ 183 et seq., as amended, to a limitation of liability on claims arising from the collision of its vessel, the Steamer Steel-ton, with Bridge No. 12 in the course of the ship’s passage through the Welland Canal of the St. Lawrence Seaway. The maritime and admiralty jurisdiction of this Court is properly invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1333.
On August 5, 1977, plaintiff filed in this Court its Motion to Dismiss All…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Louisiana Ex Rel. Guste v. the M/V TestbankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1981