Legal Opinion

Boyster v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 23, 2008No. CA 07-593Published

1Opinion of the Court

272 S.W.3d 139 (2008)

James BOYSTER, Appellant,

v.

Teresa SHOEMAKE, Appellee.

No. CA 07-593.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas.

January 23, 2008.

Jerry Pruitt, Fort Smith, AR, for appellant.

Walters, Gaston, and Ridgley, by: Bill Walters, Greenwood, AR, for appellee.

WENDELL L. GRIFFEN, Judge.

On April 23, 2007, the Sebastian County Circuit Court entered an order finding that appellee Teresa Shoemake presented proof of a boundary line by acquiescence between property belonging to her and appellant James Boyster. Appellant asserts that the circuit court clearly erred in making that finding, contending that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jennings v. BurfordCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Petrus v. Nature ConservancySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Summers v. DietschCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Fish v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API