Shell Oil Co., Inc. v. Haunchild
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This is an action by defendants in error against Shell Oil Company, Continental Oil Company, and others, to recover damages arising from the salt water pollution of the soil of plaintiffs’ farm alleged to have been caused by defendants. Plaintiffs were awarded judgment in the sum of $1,000 against the defendants named and they appeal therefrom. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiff’s farm, consisting of 90 acres and described as E. 1/2 S.W. 1/4 sec. 8, twp. 28 N., R. 1 W. and S.W. 1/4 S.E. 1/4 N.W. 1/4 of said section, is located within an oil field…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Russell v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Prest-O-Lite Co., Inc. v. HowerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. RhoadesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
- Ironside v. IronsideSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harper-Turner Oil Company v. BridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Wesley McCready Administrator of the Estate of E.M. Morris, Deceased v. United Iron and Steel Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
- Peppers Refining Company v. SpiveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.