Legal Opinion

Dixon v. . Haar

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 13, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from G. W. Ward, J., at November Term, 1911, of DupliN. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by Mr. Chief Justice Clark.

1Opinion of the Court

Clakk,, 0. J.

Tbis action was begun before a justice of tbe peace in Duplin County by tbe plaintiff, wbo lived in tbat county, against tbe defendant, Register of Deeds of New Hanover, to recover tbe penalty of $200, under Revisal, 2090, for unlawfully issuing a marriage license. Tbe summons was served upon the defendant, wbo happened to be in Duplin County.

Tbe justice refused the motion to remove tbe action for trial from Duplin to .New Hanover, and rendered judgment against defendant, from which be appealed to tbe Superior Court. On appeal, tbe defendant moved in 'the Superior Court to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Cogdell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Lilly & Bro. v. PurcellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Fisher v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Wooten v. . Maultsby and AnotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Austin v. J. W. Lewis & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coats v. Sampson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Hawley v. HobgoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Caldwell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Lott v. BrahamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Baldwin v. WilkieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API