Brown v. Cogdell.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by James Brown against Samnel Cogdell, heard by Judge T. A. McNeill at April Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of Pitt County. From a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
This is an action for the recovery of personal property. The plaintiff is a resident of Pitt County and both of the defendants reside in Beaufort County, where also the property seized and the subject of the action was situated.
The appeal from the refusal of the defendant’s motion to remove the cause to Beaufort County was not premature. Connor v. Dillard, 129 N. C., 50 ; Roberts v. Connor, 125 N. C., 45 ; Alliance v. Murrill, 119 N. C., 124. Actions for the recovery of personal property are properly triable in the county in which such property is situated. The Code, sec. 190 (4), as amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. Town of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Connor v. Dillard.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Roberts v. . ConnorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Smithdeal v. . WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Buckle v. Ogden Furniture & Carpet Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Roberts & Hoge, Inc. v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Richmond Cedar Works v. J. L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ThrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.