Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Wilkie

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 2006No. COA05-1503PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432WYNN, Judge.

Under Section 1-82 of the North Carolina General Statutes, an "action must be tried in the county in which the plaintiffs or the defendants . . . reside at its commencement[.]"1 Here, Defendants argue that venue in Wake County was improper because none of the original parties to the action were residents of Wake County. Because the action was amended as a matter of right2 adding Plaintiffs who are residents of Wake County, we hold the trial court did not err in denying Defendants' motion to change venue.

On 17 December 2004, Plaintiffs Timothy and Kellie Baldwin, individually and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Key International Manufacturing, Inc. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Nello L. Teer Co. v. Hitchcock Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Coderre v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Thomas v. Vill. of Bald Head IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
  4. Thomas v. Vill. of Bald Head IslandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API