Legal Opinion

Vanek v. Foster

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1953No. 7825PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEETON, Justice.

The parties to this proceeding will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Appellants will be referred to as plaintiffs, respondents as defendants.

By the terms of a written contract entered into on the 20th of February, 1950, defendants T. D. Foster, Jr. and the Foster Company, agreed to sell and plaintiffs agreed to buy the North 30 ft. of Lot 3, and the South 20 ft. of Lot 4, Block 7, Homeland Addition to Burley, Idaho, for a consideration of $7,100. The contract of sale and receipt for the down payment of $800 was signed:

“The Foster Co.

T. D. Foster, Jr.,

Seller”

T…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stearns v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Schlieff v. BistlineIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Burke Land & Livestock Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wormward v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Boesiger v. DeModenaIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Anderson v. Idaho Mutual Benefit AssociationIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Freeburn v. FreeburnIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API