Legal Opinion

White, Corbin & Co. v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 6, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by White, Corbin & Co. against William Martin Jones to enforce defendant’s statutory liability as a stockholder in the Rochester Lithographic & Printing Company. Verdict for plaintiff, and a motion for a new trial on exceptions was ordered to be heard in the appellate division in the first instance. Granted. See 34 N. Y. Supp. 203; 61 N. Y. Supp. 21.

1Opinion of the CourtSpring, J.

The defendant was a stockholder of the corporation known as the Rochester Lithographing & Printing Company. This company was formed May 10, 1887, and it was the result of the combination of two copartnerships,-—-Williard, Pitts & Moore and Geobel & Vredenburgh,—each of which had been engaged in business in the city of Rochester for some time. The chief part of the $50,000 capital stock of the corporation consisted of the properties of those two companies. The defendant purchased stock in the corporation in February, 1888, to the amount of $6,000, and later, when the corporation was on the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boon v. . MossNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Mitchell v. . ReadNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of RandellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889
  4. Beebe v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Brett v. EbelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Brown v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Kingston v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sturtevant v. DowsonOregon Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API