Legal Opinion
AM International, Inc. v. Datacard Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 5, 1992No. 87 C 3408PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge.
Before the court are the objections of plaintiff-counterdefendant AM International, Inc. (“AMI”), defendants-counterclaim-ants DataCard Corporation and Addresso-graph Farrington, Inc., and counterclaim-ant DBS, Inc. (collectively “counterclaim-ants”) to Magistrate Judge Ronald A. Guzman’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”). For the following reasons, the court adopts the Report. The court denies AMI’s motion for partial summary judgment, in part and grants the motion in part.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court referred all pretrial matters to…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ninth Ave. Remedial Group v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Acushnet Co. (In Re Revere Copper & Brass Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Reynolds Bros. v. Texaco, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Gray v. City of Decatur (In Re Gray)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2008