State v. Cadwallader
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Madsen, J.
The petitioner was sentenced as a persistent offender to life in prison without the possibility of early release. He argues that his sentence is unlawful because one of the two predicate strike offenses “washed out” and that the Court of Appeals erroneously allowed the State to prove an out-of-state conviction to show that the wash out period was interrupted. Because it is the State’s burden to establish criminal history at sentencing (unless the defendant pleads guilty pursuant to a plea agreement), *870we agree that the State is not entitled to rely on the out-of-state conviction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Matter of Personal Restraint of LordWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. HunleyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. ThiefaultWashington Supreme Court · 2007
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.