Legal Opinion

Woonsocket Rubber Co. v. Falley

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided March 15, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtGresham, J.

On the third day of January, 1887, Joseph D. Falley and William F. Hoes, partners in business as manufacturers of boots and shoes at La Fayette, Indiana, under the' firm name of Falley. & 'Hoes, executed a written instrument, whereby they bargained, soid, transferred, and assigned to James R. Falley, in trust, all their partuership property, of every kind, including choses in action, for the benefit of specified creditors. After specifically describing the property, and the debts to be paid out of its proceeds, the instrument declares that—

“This sale and transfer is made upon the conditions…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Winner v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Crow v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Van Patten v. BurrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Cadwell's Bank v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  5. Grubbs v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. New York Guaranty & Indemnity Co. v. Tacoma Railway & Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API