Legal Opinion

Verder v. Schack

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pécora, J.

Motion to dismiss third party complaint is granted. Third party plaintiffs were sued as the owners of a building for injuries received as a result of a fall down the shaftway of the elevator hoistway in the building. The third party complaint alleges that the third party defendant was a lessee of the third floor of the premises and was in control of the third floor including the elevator, elevator door and elevator locks. It further alleges that if recovery is had by plaintiffs against them, then such liability was caused by the primary and active negligence of the third party…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Semanchuck v. Fifth Avenue & 37th Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Wischnie v. DorschNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. Clements v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lane v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
  2. Dunn v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API