Legal Opinion
Decock v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1933No. 29,064PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 246 N.W. 885, 248 N.W. 829. This was a suit brought and tried in Lyon county for the conversion of the proceeds of a check. The plaintiff had a verdict. The defendant Midland National Bank Trust Company of Minneapolis moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The motion was denied, and a judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The company has appealed.
The plaintiff, through the defendant R.A. O'Connell, sought and obtained a loan for $6,000 upon his farm. The mortgage ran to the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Two hundred and fifty dollars was held back…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Standard Steam Specialty Co. v. Corn Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Van Reed v. People's National Bank of LebanonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Independent Oil Men's Ass'n v. Fort Dearborn National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Judd v. LandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Securities Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Monarch Wine Co. v. ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Chaffer v. Glens Falls National Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.