Legal Opinion

Agnew v. Haskell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 19, 1984No. C83-4-48; CA A29328PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

In this declaratory judgment proceeding, defendants Green appeal a judgment declaring that a road crossing their property is a public road by prescription or implied dedication, that plaintiff had acquired a prescriptive easement in the road where it crosses defendants’ property and that plaintiff has an irrevocable oral license to use the road for ingress and egress to his property. The only issue on appeal is whether the court erred in denying defendants’ request for trial by jury. We affirm.

Defendants argue that this is in the nature of an action at law and that they were therefore…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Baum Et Ux v. DennOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Heisley v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. McCoy v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGill v. WahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Thompson v. PendletonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API