Legal Opinion

Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Youngblood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1989No. 87-1531PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Universal Underwriters Insurance Company appeals from a judgment declaring that it is obligated under an insurance policy to defend ten actions filed against its insureds, Youngblood-Perry Lincoln Mercury, Inc., and Franklin Perry. Ten employees of Youngblood-Perry brought those actions, which include counts for breach of contract, negligence, misrepresentation, and suppression of material facts. Universal contends that no duty to defend exists both because the operative facts do not constitute an "occurrence" within the meaning of the policy and because several exclusions apply.

In their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. US Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Ladner Co., Inc. v. Southern Guaranty Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Lowman v. Piedmont Exec. Shirt Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Garvin v. ShewbartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Burnham Shoes, Inc. v. West American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. SL Industries, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Wood v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API